Oncologic impact of concomitant prostate cancer characteristics at the time of radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a population-based analysis

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of concomitant prostate cancer (PCa) of the cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in the aging patient’s papulation with bladder cancer (BCa) treated with radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP). Materials and Methods: Within the SEER databas...

Verfasser: Kachanov, Mykyta
Vetterlein, Malte Wolfram
Soave, Armin Maximilian Peter
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Liakos, Nikolaos
Jankowski, Thomas
Pose, Randi M.
Mendrek, Mikolaj
Fisch, Margit
Witt, Jörn Hinrich
Graefen, Markus
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
Dokumenttypen:Artikel
Medientypen:Text
Erscheinungsdatum:2022
Publikation in MIAMI:01.12.2022
Datum der letzten Änderung:30.08.2023
Angaben zur Ausgabe:[Electronic ed.]
Quelle:The Aging Male 25 (2022) 1, 47-54
Schlagwörter:Prostate cancer; bladder cancer; SEER
Fachgebiet (DDC):610: Medizin und Gesundheit
Lizenz:CC BY 4.0
Sprache:English
Förderung:Finanziert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU Münster).
Format:PDF-Dokument
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-12009749397
Weitere Identifikatoren:DOI: 10.17879/72009539296
Permalink:https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-12009749397
Verwandte Dokumente:
  • ist identisch zu:
  • Onlinezugriff:10.1080_13685538.2022.2040982.pdf

    Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of concomitant prostate cancer (PCa) of the cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in the aging patient’s papulation with bladder cancer (BCa) treated with radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP). Materials and Methods: Within the SEER database (2004–2015), 1468 patients were treated with RCP for BCa harboring histopathological PCa findings. To account for other cause mortality (OCM), multivariable competing risk regression (CRR) tested for potential BCa-CSM differences according to PCa characteristics risk factors predicting CSM Results: CRR analysis revealed that only following BCa characteristics, as high pathological tumor stages(Ta/Tis/T1 [REF.] vs. T2; HR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.16-3.57, p ¼ 0.014 vs. T3; HR 4.32, 95% CI: 2.45-7.61, p < 0.001 vs. T4; HR 5.06, 95% CI: 2.77–9.22, p < 0.001), as well unfavorable BCa grade IV (Grade I–II [REF.] vs. Grade IV; HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.98, p < 0.041) achieved independent predictor status of CSM. With regard to PCa characteristics, none of the covariates yielded independent predictor status of CSM. Conclusions: Our study, based on the largest population cohort, demonstrates that even in organ-confined BCa patients, concomitant PCa as second malignancy does not represent a risk factor for survival.