The Lymph-Sparing Quotient: A Retrospective Risk Analysis on Extremity Radiation for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment

Radiation therapy (RT) for extremity soft tissue sarcoma is associated with lymphedema risk. In this study, we analyzed the influence of lymph-sparing volume on the lymphedema occurrence in patients who received adjuvant extremity RT. The lymph-sparing quotient (LSQ) was calculated by dividing the l...

Verfasser: Sarif, Iqbal
Elsayad, Khaled
Daniel, Rolf
Kittel, Christopher
Gosheger, Georg
Wardelmann, Eva
Haverkamp, Uwe
Eich, Hans-Theodor
FB/Einrichtung:FB 05: Medizinische Fakultät
Dokumenttypen:Artikel
Medientypen:Text
Erscheinungsdatum:2021
Publikation in MIAMI:12.10.2022
Datum der letzten Änderung:12.10.2022
Angaben zur Ausgabe:[Electronic ed.]
Quelle:Cancers 13 (2021) 9, 2113, 1-12
Schlagwörter:radiotherapy; soft tissue sarcoma; lymphedema; toxicity; personalized treatment; risk-based treatment
Fachgebiet (DDC):610: Medizin und Gesundheit
Lizenz:CC BY 4.0
Sprache:English
Förderung:Finanziert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU Münster).
Format:PDF-Dokument
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-12059483101
Weitere Identifikatoren:DOI: 10.17879/62069515052
Permalink:https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-12059483101
Verwandte Dokumente:
Onlinezugriff:10.3390_cancers13092113.pdf

Radiation therapy (RT) for extremity soft tissue sarcoma is associated with lymphedema risk. In this study, we analyzed the influence of lymph-sparing volume on the lymphedema occurrence in patients who received adjuvant extremity RT. The lymph-sparing quotient (LSQ) was calculated by dividing the lymph-sparing volume by the total extremity volume with double weightingfor the narrowest lymph-sparing region. A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this analysis. The median applied total radiation dose was 66.3 Gy in 36 fractions. Acute lymphedema appeared in 12 patients (35%). Most of them (n = 8) were lymphedema grade 1 and five patients had grade 2 to 3 lymphedema. Chronic lymphedema appeared in 22 patients (65%). 17 of these patients had at least a grade 2 lymphedema. In 13 of 14 patients with an LSQ ≤ 0.2 and 11 of 20 patients with an LSQ > 0.2, an acute or chronic lymphedema ≥ grade 2 was observed. A Kaplan–Meier Analysis of the two groups with the endpoint of a two-year lymph edema-free survival (=2-YLEFS) was estimated with an univariate, significant result (2-YLEFS LSQ ≤ 0.2 vs. LSQ > 0.2: 0% vs. 39%; p = 0.006; hazard ratio LSQ ≤ 0.2 vs. > 0.2 2-YLEFS 2.822 (p = 0.013); 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24–6.42). Maximizing the potential oncologically-justifiable lymph-sparing volume should be considered to reduce the risk of high-grade lymphedema when applying RT to extremities.