Innovation methodologies and Design Thinking as supporting instruments in the development of non-assembled products
In a review and theoretical analysis, Quality Function Deployment, Design Thinking and complementary methodologies have been assessed as supporting instruments in the development of non-assembled products. The findings demonstrate that QFD and DT characteristics substantially differ and that DT lack...
| Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttypen: | Artikel |
| Medientypen: | Text |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2023 |
| Publikation in MIAMI: | 24.02.2023 |
| Datum der letzten Änderung: | 24.02.2023 |
| Quelle: | Journal of Business Chemistry, 20 (2023) 1, S. 9-30 |
| Angaben zur Ausgabe: | [Electronic ed.] |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 330: Wirtschaft |
| Lizenz: | InC 1.0 |
| Sprache: | English |
| Anmerkungen: | Section "Research Paper" |
| Format: | PDF-Dokument |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-11059726863 |
| Weitere Identifikatoren: | DOI: 10.17879/11059717036 |
| Permalink: | https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-11059726863 |
| Onlinezugriff: | jbc_2023_20_1_9-30.pdf |
In a review and theoretical analysis, Quality Function Deployment, Design Thinking and complementary methodologies have been assessed as supporting instruments in the development of non-assembled products. The findings demonstrate that QFD and DT characteristics substantially differ and that DT lacks many aspects of importance for process-industrial application. However, the results show that the methodologies are complementary in use; thus, an indepth knowledge of both methodologies could create a company competitive advantage in product innovation. Companies in the process industries are thus advised to use the results as a guiding framework for methodology selection and use in the different parts of the product innovation work process.