Summer fluxes of methane and carbon dioxide from a pond and floating mat in a continental Canadian peatland

Ponds smaller than 10 000 m² likely account for about one-third of the global lake perimeter. The release of methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) from these ponds is often high and significant on the landscape scale. We measured CO₂ and CH₄ fluxes in a temperate peatland in southern Ontario, Canad...

Verfasser: Burger, Magdalena
Berger, Sina
Spangenberg, Ines
Blodau, Christian
Dokumenttypen:Artikel
Medientypen:Text
Erscheinungsdatum:2016
Publikation in MIAMI:15.08.2016
Datum der letzten Änderung:16.04.2019
Angaben zur Ausgabe:[Electronic ed.]
Quelle:Biogeosciences 13 (2016) 12, 3777–3791
Fachgebiet (DDC):550: Geowissenschaften, Geologie
570: Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Rechtlicher Vermerk:© Author(s) 2016
Lizenz:CC BY 3.0
Sprache:English
Format:PDF-Dokument
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-45209457722
Weitere Identifikatoren:DOI: 10.5194/bg-13-3777-2016
Permalink:https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-45209457722
Onlinezugriff:bg-13-3777-2016.pdf

Ponds smaller than 10 000 m² likely account for about one-third of the global lake perimeter. The release of methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) from these ponds is often high and significant on the landscape scale. We measured CO₂ and CH₄ fluxes in a temperate peatland in southern Ontario, Canada, in summer 2014 along a tran- sect from the open water of a small pond (847 m²) towards the surrounding floating mat (5993 m²) and in a peatland reference area. We used a high-frequency closed chamber technique and distinguished between diffusive and ebulli- tive CH₄ fluxes. CH₄ fluxes and CH₄ bubble frequency in- creased from a median of 0.14 (0.00 to 0.43) mmol m⁻² h⁻¹ and 4 events m⁻² h⁻¹ on the open water to a median of 0.80 (0.20 to 14.97) mmol m⁻² h⁻¹ and 168 events m⁻² h⁻¹ on the floating mat. The mat was a summer hot spot of CH₄ emissions. Fluxes were 1 order of magnitude higher than at an adjacent peatland site. During daytime the pond was a net source of CO₂ equivalents to the atmosphere amounting to 0.13 (-0.02 to 1.06) g CO₂ equivalents m⁻² h⁻¹, whereas the adjacent peatland site acted as a sink of -0.78 (-1.54 to 0.29) g CO₂ equivalents m⁻² h⁻¹. The photosynthetic CO₂ uptake on the floating mat did not counterbalance the high CH₄ emissions, which turned the floating mat into a strong net source of 0.21 (-0.11 to 2.12) g CO₂ equivalents m⁻² h⁻¹. This study highlights the large small-scale variability of CH₄ fluxes and CH₄ bubble frequency at the peatland– pond interface and the importance of the often large ecotone areas surrounding small ponds as a source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.