What Is Owed to Refugees when Attributing Responsibilities to States in Institutionalized Responsibility Sharing Regimes?
Responsibility sharing has been at the core of the debates on asylum in the European Union given that the legal framework designed to perform this task, the so-called Dublin System, failed to provide justice among states in responsibility attribution by its very design. This paper addresses the ques...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Document types: | Article |
| Media types: | Text |
| Publication date: | 2019 |
| Date of publication on miami: | 11.04.2019 |
| Modification date: | 13.04.2021 |
| Source: | Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop "Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis", S. 79-94 |
| Edition statement: | [Electronic ed.] |
| Subjects: | Asyl; Verantwortungsteilung; Gerechtigkeit asylum; responsibility sharing; justice |
| DDC Subject: | 172: Politische Ethik
325: Internationale Migration, Kolonisation |
| License: | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
| Language: | English |
| Format: | PDF document |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-95189437530 |
| Other Identifiers: | DOI: 10.17879/95189437167 |
| Permalink: | https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-95189437530 |
| Digital documents: | artikel_dziedzic_2019_what-is-owed-to-refugees.pdf |
Responsibility sharing has been at the core of the debates on asylum in the European Union given that the legal framework designed to perform this task, the so-called Dublin System, failed to provide justice among states in responsibility attribution by its very design. This paper addresses the question of justice in responsibility sharing among the Member States of the EU while also providing normative and empirical arguments for rethinking what is being owed to refugees qua refugees, as the envisioned beneficiaries of responsibility sharing regimes, when thinking about reforming the system of responsibility attribution in Europe.