|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03238cam a2200421uu 4500 |
001 |
b2f573a9-0360-4fb6-b6a9-1a771e792cea |
003 |
miami |
005 |
20190416 |
007 |
c||||||||||||a| |
008 |
150109e20150109||||||||||#s||||||||eng|||||| |
022 |
|
|
|a 1746-160X
|
024 |
7 |
|
|a urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-90389477603
|2 urn
|
024 |
7 |
|
|a doi:10.1186/1746-160X-10-51
|2 doi
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
|2 23
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Reicheneder, Claudia
|0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/172625246
|4 aut
|
110 |
2 |
|
|a Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster
|0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/5091030-9
|4 own
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
|
250 |
|
|
|a [Electronic ed.]
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2014-11-28
|
264 |
|
2 |
|b Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster
|c 2015-01-09
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1-6
|
500 |
|
|
|a Finanziert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2014/2015 der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) und der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU Münster).
|
506 |
0 |
|
|a free access
|
510 |
0 |
|
|a BMC Head & Face Medicine 10 (2014) 51, 1-6
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Introduction: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. Methods: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. Results: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO. Conclusions: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use.<br>
|
521 |
|
|
|a specialized
|
540 |
|
|
|a CC BY 4.0
|u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
|
653 |
|
0 |
|a Retainer
|a Wire
|a Adhesive
|a Sandblasting
|a Shear bond strength
|
655 |
|
7 |
|2 DRIVER Types
|a Artikel
|
655 |
|
7 |
|2 DCMI Types
|a Text
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Hofrichter, Bernd
|0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/1104847558
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Faltermeier, Andreas
|0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/130158801
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Proff, Peter
|0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/132959429
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Lippold, Carsten
|u FB 05: Medizinische Fakultät
|0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/122322517
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kirschneck, Christian Johannes
|0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/1046352989
|4 aut
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|3 Zum Volltext
|q text/html
|u https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-90389477603
|u urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-90389477603
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|3 Zum Volltext
|q application/pdf
|u https://repositorium.uni-muenster.de/document/miami/b2f573a9-0360-4fb6-b6a9-1a771e792cea/1746-160X-10-51.pdf
|