Lässt Kants Völkerbund als Mitgliedsstaaten nur Republiken zu?
It often seems to be an unquestioned presupposition that Kant’s concept of the federation of states is limited to states with a republican constitution. In this paper, I argue, firstly, that this presupposition is unwarranted and, secondly, that there are further problems as regards the interpretati...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Document types: | Article |
| Media types: | Text |
| Publication date: | 2012 |
| Date of publication on miami: | 07.12.2017 |
| Modification date: | 16.04.2019 |
| Edition statement: | [Electronic ed.] |
| Source: | Kant-Studien 103 (2012) 1, 114-125 |
| Subjects: | Exzellenzcluster Religion und Politik; Weltstaat; Weltfriede; Immanuel Kant; Politische Philosophie Cluster of Excellence Religion and Politics; world state; world peace; Immanuel Kant; political philosophy |
| DDC Subject: | 172: Politische Ethik
193: Philosophie in Deutschland und Österreich |
| License: | InC 1.0 |
| Language: | German |
| Notes: | Die Veröffentlichung erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung des de Gruyter Verlags. |
| Format: | PDF document |
| ISSN: | 0022-8877 |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-50229578613 |
| Other Identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kant-2012-0006 |
| Permalink: | https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-50229578613 |
| Digital documents: | artikel_hoesch_2012_kants-voelkerbund.pdf |
It often seems to be an unquestioned presupposition that Kant’s concept of the federation of states is limited to states with a republican constitution. In this paper, I argue, firstly, that this presupposition is unwarranted and, secondly, that there are further problems as regards the interpretation of Kant’s international law.