The economics of mandatory security breach reporting to authorities

Legislators in many countries enact security breach notification regulation to address a lack of information security. The laws designate authorities to collect breach reports and advise firms. We devise a principal–agent model to analyze the economic effect of mandatory security breach reporting to...

Verfasser: Laube, Stefan
Böhme, Rainer
FB/Einrichtung:FB 04: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Dokumenttypen:Artikel
Medientypen:Text
Erscheinungsdatum:2016
Publikation in MIAMI:10.02.2017
Datum der letzten Änderung:16.04.2019
Angaben zur Ausgabe:[Electronic ed.]
Quelle:Journal of Cybersecurity 2 (2016) 1, 29-41
Fachgebiet (DDC):330: Wirtschaft
Lizenz:CC BY-NC 4.0
Sprache:English
Anmerkungen:Finanziert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2015/2016 der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU Münster).
Format:PDF-Dokument
ISSN:2057-2093
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-53229502051
Weitere Identifikatoren:DOI: 10.1093/cybsec/tyw002
Permalink:https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-53229502051
Onlinezugriff:tyw002.pdf

Legislators in many countries enact security breach notification regulation to address a lack of information security. The laws designate authorities to collect breach reports and advise firms. We devise a principal–agent model to analyze the economic effect of mandatory security breach reporting to authorities. The model assumes that firms (agents) have few incentives to unilaterally report breaches. To enforce the law, regulators (principals) can introduce security audits and sanction noncompliance. However, audits cannot differentiate between concealment and nescience of the agents. Even under optimistic assumptions regarding the effectiveness of mandatory security breach reporting to authorities in reducing individual losses, our model predicts that it may be difficult to adjust the sanction level such that breach notification laws generate social benefit.